Arvind Kejriwal is the most under-rated man in India today- even now, even after he has staged the spectacular coup in Delhi.
Most political parties consider him a flash in the pan: the Congress sees him as a limited urban phenomenon which will have no effect on its traditional rural vote banks nurtured by the politics of “entitlement”; the Samajwadi Party and BSP still feel secure in their carefully woven cocoons of religion and caste, respectively; the likes of AIADMK in Tamil Nadu, BJD in Odisha and TMC in West Bengal are confident that the regional broth they have been cooking in their states has no place for any other ingredient; and the BJP, still smarting at being denied power in Delhi, is so far into denial mode that it refuses to even recognise the Aam Admi Party (AAP) as anything but the B team of the Congress!
In short, they all see Kejriwal, the Chief Minister of Delhi, as nothing but a latter day Bahadur Shah Zafar, whose writ does not prevail beyond the Yamuna.
The facts tell a completely different story.
What they tell us is that Kejriwal is a brilliant tactician, a master of guerrilla warfare who has completely routed the overwhelmingly superior forces of the Congress and the BJP by skilfully changing the rules of engagement.
In the process he has caught the imagination of the entire nation and resurrected the hope that change IS possible. It is not only the issues he took up, but the manner in which he took them up, the personal demonstration of his beliefs, that made the difference in Delhi. Here’s a list of what he did differently:
- Total identification with the ” aam aadmi”- in dress, language, uncompromising candour, the company he kept, consulting the ” mohalla” on every issue, the whole tenor of his campaign. He did not hold huge rallies( like Modi) but walked the streets or drove in auto-rickshaws( not SUVs) to talk to people in THEIR houses; he was grateful for a donation of even ten rupees; he was beaten up outside police stations and VIP bungalows and arrested when reconnecting meters of labourers who were given electricity bills of Rs. 20000 for a month; he was rubbished day in and day out by TV anchors and all political parties. He personified, gradually, the harassed, vilified, exploited, unheard “aam aadmi” who saw in him, and through him, their chance to get even with the fat cat politicians and bureaucrats.
- Making corruption the corner-stone of his political message. He saw, perhaps as no one else did, that, while the Material was still important for the voter, it was the erosion of the MORAL essence of the nation- exemplified by corruption-that evoked a deep anger, frustration and desire for change. His master-stroke was to take on both, the Congress and the BJP, on this as there was indeed little to differentiate them on this. He was rewarded by claiming a substantial part of both their vote shares.
- Total transparency- in funding, selection of candidates, decision making. An unheard of phenomenon in ALL our political parties, it further reinforced the people’s faith in him as walking the talk. These features were put to the test repeatedly -fake sting operations, special audit of his foreign donations, dropping of a candidate for having a case registered against him- but Kejriwal stood his ground, gaining even more credibility.
- Attracting thousands of volunteers to spread his message. His party/movement/campaign-call it what you will-was supported on the shoulders of people who believed in the message, not people whose belief was proportional to what they were paid to spread it! And these volunteers were not musclemen or rent-a rabble types( the mainstay of all political parties), but students, IITians, NRIs, retired public servants, private sector execs on a sabbatical. Their faith in the AAP could not but be contagious.
- Selection of candidates. Till Kejriwal muddied the waters, the democratic process in India was initiated by a party thrusting a candidate on the voter-take it or leave it. No reason was ever proffered for choosing or rejecting a person.For the first time ever Kejriwal announced a check list of criteria for screening the applications. He also introduced a kind of ” primaries” where the short list was generated by the voters themselves: they therefore ” owned” the candidate -he was their candidate in the true sense. Nothing else can explain the victory of AAP nominees( pitted against mainstream stalwarts and multiple-time MLAs and Ministers) whose names one had never heard of. Rakhi Birla? Saurabh Bharadwaj? Would any other party have even considered them for a ticket?
- Complete and unambiguous rejection of the VIP culture that the people have come to detest with a visceral loathing that only Kejriwal could assess accurately. He confronted it with a simplicity of demeanor and personal conduct that took one back to the days of Gandhi, Acharya Kriplani and Jaiprakash Narayan-a reminder of what real democracy once was, and could be again, if the usurpers could be shown the door. It was a powerful appeal, especially to the young and the professionals who are no respecters of the in-your -face arrogance that has become the hallmark of the so called “people’s representatives” today.
The success of the “Kejriwal package” should not be seen only in the 30% vote share or the 28 seats he garnered in Delhi. Its true success-and future implication and promise-lies in the manner in which it has instantaneously changed the political narrative and public attitudes of our rulers.
The BJP forewent the support of four MLAs in Delhi and sulked in the Opposition benches, whereas earlier it could have purchased them in to time at all; Sheila Dikshit started the process of moving out of her palatial bungalow within days of losing office; Vasundra Raje voluntarily reduced her security entourage ( and yesterday announced her decision to move to a less palatial residence); the Lok Pal Bill was passed in two weeks by the same Party that had stalled it for twenty years; Rahul Gandhi, no less, publicly stated that there was a lot his party needed to learn from the AAP; the Congress was forced to go back on its earlier decision of rejecting the Adarsh Commission report; the Haryana Chief Minister has declared a reduction in electricity tariff, and Maharashtra will follow suit any day, forced to follow the AAP’s pitch in Delhi.
These are not isolated events but straws in a wind that is in fact the Kejriwal effect. They are welcome harbingers of a gradual change initiated by the victory of AAP in Delhi, and the ripples are moving out of Delhi in ever widening circles, engulfing the dinosaurs that have ruled this country for decades.
The AAP victory in Delhi contains other positive indicators of the paradigm shift we are witnessing in our polity. It convincingly demolished age-old myths relating to elections in India, myths which justified practices that have corrupted and eaten away the very essence of democracy in our country.
For example, Kejriwal completely eschewed calculations of caste, religion or region in both the selection of his party’s candidates or the manner in which he campaigned, catching veteran politicians, psephologists and TV anchors-who can conceive of no other matrix for elections-by total surprise.
And the AAP succeeded hugely in its attempt to show that elections need not be held hostage to these factors-both SP and BSP failed to win a single seat; even better, their vote shares declined massively, indicating that even their presumed ” captive ” vote banks did not vote for them!
The Congress, which believes that it holds a Power of Attorney for all Muslims minorities and ” weaker sections” fared even worse- not one of its candidates from these constituencies won. This has forced the Mayawatis, Mulayams and Lalus of this world to go back to the drawing board, a withdrawal which can have only a positive fallout.
To take another example, AAP contested 70 seats on a budget of Rs. 20 crore only (Rs. 2 crore was saved even out of this!). This works out to just Rs. 25 lakhs per seat, a figure with which no self respecting party in India would even think of contesting a Gram Pradhan seat!
Kejriwal has effectively demonstrated that CLEAN politics is possible, if only our main parties have the will to stop tapping black money, that it is not necessary to bribe voters or ply them with hooch to earn their loyalty.
Can anything be more telling than that a party just 15 months old with 20 crores in its kitty humbled two parties with a combined age of 100 years and coffers overflowing with declared funds of almost 4000 crores?
If this is not the beginning of a non-violent revolution, then I fail to see what it is.
AAP has shown that political parties do not have to ghetto-ise the electorate, carve them into separate components, create divisions among them, to win elections. Kejriwal has forcefully demonstrated that a party CAN appeal to ALL sections and classes of people- urban/rural, rich/poor, majority/minority, upper/lower caste, employed/unemployed- with a message that cuts across these artificial distinctions behind which all major parties have been hiding all these years.
The voting pattern in Delhi proves this- he has been backed by a genuine cross section of all the categories above, and his appeal is not limited to any one of them.
If even the super-rich of South Delhi who rarely come out of their BMWs to rub shoulders with the proletariat stood in line to caste their vote for an unknown ex-software engineer who bearded the lion’s cub in the latter’s own den, surely there is a strong message here?
That the voter of India has finally been released from the shackles of an imposed identity and is now free to vote for a party that transcends such labelling?
Make no mistake – the Agenda for the 2014 elections is now being set by the Aam Aadmi Party.
All major and regional parties are desperately scrambling to reinvent themselves in the image of Arvind Kejriwal and his team. (And that is where the real success of AAP is to be found- politics in India will never be the same again).
Publicly, mainstream parties are in denial mode, but they are worried at the resurgence in the passion which the AAP is evoking across the country-hundreds of thousands of volunteers are joining the “monsoon insect” from Ghaziabad and the Modi wave is being replaced by the Kejriwal tsunami.
Derisively dismissed as a Delhi phenomenon, the AAP is now being wooed in Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, UP, and by the Left.
The Congress has already lost the 2014 elections. Till a month ago the BJP and Modi were the clear favourites, but Delhi has changed all that. Kejriwal has stopped the Modi juggernaut not just in Delhi but across the country-there is now a real possibility that the NDA will fall well short of the 200 mark. Here are some facts:
- Delhi, and the response in Bangalore, Lucknow, Hyderabad, Jaipur to name just a few, have shown that the AAP has tremendous appeal in the metros and urban areas. There are about 200 urban Parliamentary constituencies and AAP will almost certainly be contesting most of them. That is bad news for the BJP which was relying on them to reach the magic figure. If AAP can get even half the vote share in these towns that it got in Delhi ( a distinct possibility) Modi would have lost the war.
- North India was where the NDA was hoping to increase its tally: unfortunately, that is precisely the area where the Kejriwal effect will be most felt. The constituencies around Delhi- in UP and Haryana, particularly- are Kejriwal’s to lose, in my opinion. After Muzzafarpur the Muslims are likely to desert the SP in hordes: most are likely to go to Mayawati, but a substantial number, fed up of both, will gravitate to the AAP. So will a fair percentage of the BSP’s scheduled caste vote bank, if Delhi is anything to go by. The more liberal and educated Hindus, who had given up on both the Congress and the SP and had reluctantly decided to support the BJP for want of an alternative, now have one in the AAP. The combined effect of all this is bound to reduce the BJP’s vote share in the state.
- That the AAP is now actively thinking of alliances in some states (with the Left and smaller regional parties) will also significantly dent the BJP’s expected vote share as it will deny the the latter the votes that shall now move away from the Congress, and which the BJP was hoping to garner. Bi-polar contests, where the BJP and the Congress faced each other one-on-one, would definitely have suited the former, but a tri-polar one with the AAP being the third pole would not. That, essentially, was the difference between Rajasthan-Madhya Pradesh-Chhatisgarh and Delhi in the recent elections. There will not be many bi-polar gifts for the BJP this time around.
It is a distinct possibility that the AAP shall capture 30-35 seats in Parliament ( seven of them shall come from Delhi itself, given the manner in which the BJP is demonstrating its pettiness there, nitpicking on a daily basis on the nature of Congress support to the AAP, allotment of houses and cars to the new Ministers, wild allegations of money-bags brokering deals to form the AAP government – being a bad loser is one thing, but being a stupid one is worse.
The BJP is just refusing to learn any lessons from its humbling in Delhi. And matters for the BJP can only get worse, once Kejriwal starts digging into the alleged corruption in the four Municipal Corporations). These seats can only come at the cost of the BJP to whom they would have gone had there been no AAP in the fray. If this happens it will seal the fate of Modi and the BJP.
With 30 or so seats in Parliament, AAP may well be the single largest party outside of the big two. To my mind, it will then become the natural choice to head the Third Front for three reasons.
First, it will be the only party from this group to have a truly national footprint, all the others being one state wonders: being far more representative of the nation, the AAP will have a greater claim to head a national coalition government.
Second, AAP does not yet have the inter-party baggage of mutual rivalries and competing egos that the others carry: Jayalalitha and Karunanidhi, Mamta and the Left, Mulayam and Mayawati, Nitish and Lalu. It will therefore be easier for these worthies to extend support to Kejriwal than to any one of each other.
Third, the groundswell of support for Kejriwal will only grow ( just as it had for Modi) forcing the other leaders to fall in line. With 30 seats in the the AAP’s bag the people of India would have found an alternative to the BJP and the Congress.
Arvind Kejriwal as Prime Minister of India?
In 2008 people were asking: Barack Obama as President of the USA?
Res ipsa loquitor.
Avay Shukla retired from the Indian Administrative Service in December 2010. He is a keen environmentalist and loves the mountains.
He divides his time between Delhi and his cottage in a small village above Shimla. He used to play golf at one time but has now run out of balls.
He blogs at http://avayshukla.blogspot.in/
Well done, well written, a fantastic read, in-depth, serious and yet simple enough for aam people like myself to understand, relate and see hope midst all the riff-raff and clutter which has been the political scene thus far. There is a light at the end of the tunnel and it shines brightly for the future of this glorious country. India will be shining again… in its truest sense. Thank you.
While Aam Aadmi party has done wonderful contribution to the nation by bringing the issues of corruption, governance and cleanliness in public life to the centre of public domain. Their agenda has been touching the common man in Delhi in shape of 18 point programme. They would have to bring it in every corner of the country. But ultimately it would be their performance in Delhi which would be their measure of performance. I n the meanwhile their appraaoch has been affecting the political scene.
Even their approach to issues of promoting all round ecnomic development, employment and skill development, infrastructure development is going to be equally if not more vital for the wholesome improvement in the society.,
Avay Sir, I was expecting this to be coming from you anytime now and here it is, a good one. 🙂
If you revisit a first few comments on “Why I shall support Modi?”, I had expressed my sadness about not finding a single mention of AAP. I don’t mean I was conspicuous about AAP coming to power in their only attempt, not at all. But I was confident that this pack is here to stay, as much all over India as in Delhi, and my belief has just got stronger after the Delhi triumph. If you ask me, I see no reason to support Modi anymore. But when I talk to the belligerent Hindu nationalists, they see nothing but a socialist Nehru and a populist Congress in Kejriwal. At this point I am curious to know whom the author of that wonderful(Eye-Opener article for me back in July) article will support?
A very good question, Mr. Kalia,and like all good questions, it doesn’t have a simple answer!Its a question with which all concerned Indians are grappling right now.Kejriwal’s direct and simple appeal is very powerful, but we still have to see whether he can successfully metamorphose from an activist to an administrator and statesman.The pressures of the expectations he has built up are enormous: the next four months will be his real test.The test for Modi, on the other hand, will be to adapt to the new dynamics, political and social,unleashed by the AAP. If he can do that then he can stand his ground. Unfortunately, at the moment there appear no signs of the BJP doing that- it continues with its head stuck in the stand, dismissive of the AAP, finding fault with every little action or utterance of the AAP, refusing to acknowledge its growing popularity. If the BJP continues in this vein it is headed for disaster-only Modi can pull it out of its suicidal plunge.Ideally, I would like to see a BJP-AAP alliance govt. in May that would combine the idealism,integrity and humility of one with the nationalism, experience and decisiveness of the other.Such an alliance would bring out the best of the two parties, while neutralising their weaknesses. Will it happen? Let’s wait and watch.
I don’t see any wrong with anyone being Hindu Nationalist. Secondly, Narendra Modi is bad because he is associated with BJP. Not because he is bad himself. A riot free Gujarat. Not even a single corruption charge on the man. Remember, AK was called a rogue by Anna, IAS Members, and many other people who have worked with him in the past.
Why ignore Modi, I fail to understand. Why not stand behind the man and give him all he wants from us, full dedication to make India a prospering country.
Subsidies, freebies, mohalla sabhas’, public stings? I mean this all looks like nautanki.
I hope and sincerely pray that Modi wins the 2014. And does he what he has been doing since past 10-15 years.
@tarun Goel, Please read the article before commenting next time you have not read it for sure… Remember Mining scamster from Karnataka… you so called BJP has taken him back… remember the toll thing your BJP(Nitin Gadkari) had started it, and BJP modi is involvd in Reliance-Adani-petrochemical scam.. just google a bit… how come BJP has few thousand cr.. is it not tax payers money… the only clean money used till now is by AAP.. they can account every rupee.. just go to their website and download if you know something called Excel sheet Enjoy man :-), more over BJP had ruled before Why give them second chance….?
If you go by the delhi election results, aap will win 30 seats out of 80 just in UP itself. 7 in delhi. 30 is a conservative estimate in my opinion. A party that won 28/70 seats even when they were not considered serious contenders will surely win many more now that they are seen as contenders.
The same 2G and 3G scams that gave rise to massive corruption are being used by the AAP to inform and reach the people through internet and smartphones. Irony was never so sweet.
Tarun Sir, I might end up writing one full page but I promise I’ll stick to your agenda. Please bear with me. Expecting the least, please read with an open mind.
Firstly, I appreciate that you have entered the debate highlighting the good qualities of Modi rather than AAP bashing, till the end where you see a nautanki in AAP’s bhagidari(but not in corrupt Anurag Thakur’s protest against Virbhadra’s corruption. But thanks to our judicial system, both are innocent untill proved guilty.) Secondly, I appreciate that you agree with most of my view points. Let’s go into each one of them.
I agree with you and I never said there is any wrong in being a “Hindu nationalist” as my day starts with a visit to temple and I wish Happy Republic Day and Happy Independence(INDEPENDENCE, from British LOOTERAs) Day to my near and dears. If you read again I wrote “Belligerent Hindu Nationalists”. I am seriously concerned that we understand the difference between the two. I hope that like me you also condemn the AAP office attack by “HINDU Raksha Dal”. To show their support to Kashmir, they reduced AAP office to Kashmir. What nautanki is that?
For me, Modi is not responsible for Gujarat riots unless it is proved in the highest court. I agree that Modi is not a bad man. But neither was Manmohan, moreover unlike Modi, Manmohan had a vast experience of national scene, be it apolitical. But fortunately(or unfortunately) we no more live in a single party dominated India and coalition comes with quotas in cabinet berths. I don’t see any peril in Modi, but in his own brand of A. Rajas’ and Pawan Bansals’ he will bring along(Keep Yedyurappa and Anurag in mind while reading this). Moreover, Modi at present has down toned himself a lot and is not a threat to minorities I feel, but what about “Belligerent Hindu Nationalists” who are simmering and eager to put off that lid post May 2014?
Why ignore Modi you fail to understand. But why Kejriwal? I fail to understand. Like million others, I see a fed up citizen in him. And as I read somewhere, “I don’t think Mr. Kejriwal’s bigger fight is with Congress or BJP, but with the common man himself who is waiting for him to fail so that he can happily say – YOU KNOW I KNEW IT. HE IS JUST A COMMON MAN LIKE ME. HE CAN’T DO ANYTHING, JUST LIKE ME.”
I hope you mean it when you say freebies, subsidies, mohalla sabhas are all nautanki. So I would request you to share your view about what you see in Modi’s extravagant rallies from fake Red Forts and fake Parliaments? And if I count on figures that I can’t be sure are real, Modi gave 70000 crore in subsidies to just 3 big business houses. And if nautanki is the only reason why you hate AAP, please consider rethinking.
As promised I hope I sticked to agenda, but I want to mention one point in the end. If there were no corrupts in BJP, or RTI in funding for that sake, or a will to fight corruption, there would have been no AAP! Me, and I am sure Kejriwal would have voted for Modi. Congrats by the way, by today’s news you have Kiran Bedi, Virendar Sehwag and V K Singh on your side.
I might sound impractical but I know I’ll make sense someday.