General VK Singh’s case – More than what meets the eye

Dehradun : There is apparently more than what meets the eye in the ministry of defence not accepting 10 May 1951 as the date of birth as claimed by Gen V K Singh in lieu of 10 May 1950, forcing the chief of army staff to knock the doors of the apex court.

For there is a precedent in which the Military Secretary’s (MS) branch of the ministry of defence, under almost identical circumstances accepted, the claimed date of birth in the case of Col Ramesh Chander Joshi (IC-16142) of Engineers corp of the Indian Army.

On 13 Sep 1996 the Military Secretary’s branch vide its letter no 30004/Sep 96/Tech/MS Retirement addressed to Headquarters Western Command with copies to concerned branches stated that Col Joshi would be retiring from army service on 30 Sep 1996 after attaining the age of superannuation.

Immediately, on 16 Sep, Col Joshi’s gave an application regarding discrepancy in his date of birth, which was forwarded by the Engineer-in-Chief’s branch to MS 8, MS 7, MS 12 and Adjutant General’s (AG’s) branch of the ministry of defence.

With just 10 days left for his retirement, and fearing that the paperwork could take too much time, going beyond his date of superannuation, which would force him to retire, Col Joshi also sent a representation directly to Gen S Roy Chowdhury, who was then chief of the army staff, on 20 Sep 1996.

It is another issue he got a severe note of reprimand for having approached the chief of army staff directly, despite the fact that an application of his had also been sent through proper channel.

Exactly on the date of his retirement, that is 30 Sep 1996 an army message was sent by INDARMY (MS RETIREMENT) to WESTCOM, CDA (O) Pune and CDA (P) Allahabad saying, “this HQ letter No 30004/Sep/96/Tech/MS Retirement of 13 Sep 1996 regarding retirement of IC 16142 Col Ramesh Chander Joshi Engrs of E-in-c’s Branch Army Hq wef from 30 Sep 96 is hereby cancelled. The claimed date of birth as 25 Nov 45 has been accepted by Ministry of Defence (MOD). Officer will continue in service till further orders.” Information was also sent to various branches and the concerned officer.

Talking to Hill Post at his ancestral house here in Ballupur area of Dehradun, Col Joshi said that he joined the 25th course of the National Defence Academy (NDA), Khadakvasla in Jan 1961 (NDA no 4059). His father then Capt H S Joshi, had taken up the change of his date of birth while he was a cadet at the NDA.

“The discrepancy in the date of birth was first noticed while filling the form for appearing for Senior Cambridge. My father discovered that the date of birth as recorded in school, 22 Sep 1944, did not tally with his service records, where it was 25 Nov 1945. He brought it to the notice of the Principal of the school. Meanwhile the form of the UPSC for appearing in the 25th course of NDA had been submitted with the date of birth as 22 Sep 44”, Col Joshi said.

However, he went on to add that after protracted correspondence, the correct date of birth was accepted by the school authorities and the same was reflected in the Senior Cambridge certificate and also transfer certificate issued by the school.

“My father then applied to NDA vide his letter no 1646/P/106R dated 30 Mar 1962 to correct the date of birth. My father was intimated by the then Commandant NDA, vide his letter no 010237/100/G9cdt) Trg dated 23 Feb 1963, that the date of birth as recorded in my senior Cambridge certificate had been accepted by the UPSC and therefore by the Academy”, he claimed.

Col Joshi recalled that it was on 12 Sep 96 evening that he received a telephone message from MS-12 that there was discrepancy in his date of birth and that he should discuss the same with AMS-7A branch of ministry of defence.

“Accordingly, I went to MS-7A on 13 Sep 96, where I learnt that my date of birth was still being shown as 22 Sep 1944 though there was an unsigned copy of Adjutant General’s branch letter no 94865/Org6(sp) (a) dated 30Jan/12 Feb 1963 addressed to NDA stating that the change of date of birth to 25 Nov 45 had been accepted”, he pointed out.

Asserting that alls well that ends well, he said that in his case the MS branch had reacted within 15 days to the application that he had forwarded through proper channel for accepting his date of birth as 25 Nov 1945, against the 22 Sep 1944, which is about an year and two months later and his date of retirement was fixed as per his changed date of birth.

“If it has happened in my case why not in the case of Gen V K Singh”, he wondered.

A journalist with over 40 years of experience, Jagdish Bhatt is Editor Hill Post (Uttarakhand). Jagdish has worked with India's leading English dailies, which include Times of India, Indian Express, Pioneer and several other reputed publications. A highly acclaimed journalist, Jagdish is a recipient of many awards, latest being the 2011 Development Journalism Award. He lives in Dehra Dun.

7 Comments

  • I have known VK in Faizabad where he was commanding 2 RAJPUT. I was the Brigade Commander. I saw him
    for over one year. He was thoroughly competent, upright and outstanding. Unflappable and dignified, VK is a rare brand of officers. We should be proud of him. Obviously the MOD will like to fix him. He will be the winner
    either way. VPM

    • ive known VK as well, was his junior. he’s a bootlicker, is good to his seniors and to people who matter, doesnt really care about the people who report to him. He’s fignthing out of vengence and ego. he must be SACKED!

      • Friend, if what Brig Malhotra says is right and why should someone doubt him then you are not only wrong but also hiding your identity. I consulted a large number of my friends in armed forces and they all support brig Malhotra’s views. So either you were a nincompoop and inefficient officer who got the deserved kick or you are a paid lackey of likes of kapoor and avdesh.

  • The government can not sack V K Singh, because in that case some one else will have to be made chief in place of to whom they want for their own reason. It has now become a known secret that this all is hatched to make Lt Gen Vikram Singh, chief. Even the files of urgently required weapons for army are being delayed because of commission, which can not be possible while VK is in office of if Parnayak comes to that.Vishrant Vasisth

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.