FDI will ruin Himachal’s apple industry: Bragta

Shimla: The BJP government in Himachal Pradesh Wednesday slammed the central government’s decision to allow FDI in multi-brand retail, saying imported apples would ruin the state’s Rs.2,000-crore apple industry.

“The state is already facing tough competition from China, the US and other European countries as they are marketing apples at much lower rates in the Indian market,” Horticulture Minister Narender Bragta told reporters here.

He said now the FDI would hit the country’s fruit industry and Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Jammu and Kashmir would be the main sufferers.
“It was during the NDA (National Democratic Alliance) regime that the central government had increased the custom duty on apples up to 50 percent. After that, the centre had not raised the duty despite our repeated pleas. As a result, the arrival of foreign apples has caused much loss to the domestic market,” Bragta, who himself is a prominent apple grower in upper Shimla, said.

“Since the cost of production in the US and China is quite low and the per hectare yield (of apple) there is very high, we will not survive,” the minister said.

Himachal Pradesh’s apple boom is credited to Satyanand Stokes(Samuel Evans Stokes Junior).

Satyanand, an American missionary, first introduced high quality apples in the Kothgarh-Thanedar belt in Shimla district in the early 1920s.

His daughter-in-law, Vidya Stokes, 83, a Congress leader, manages most of the family’s orchards.

Apple constitutes about 81 percent of the state’s total fruit production. The harvesting generally begins in July and continues till November.


Join the Conversation


  1. says: Devinder Sharma

    The Minister is right in saying that the cost of production of apples elsewhere is much lower than in Himachal but his appreciation of this fact is misplaced. It is low because of the very high per hectare productivity and not otherwise as the statement probably makes it out. What stops Himachal from productivity improvements to be competitive rather than seeking non-enduring shelters or protective taxation regimes? We have heard about the efforts for too long and one awaits the outcomes of imported plant material and the improved root stocks! Can other readers and concerned people comment in this healthy debate for the betterment of our horticulturists?

  2. says: kshitij

    I think it will only benifit us as it will make the market open to more competition..
    This will only result in good quality of fruits .

Leave a comment
Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.