Is Modi falling prey to Congress game?

Major and minor tremors have continued to rock the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) ever since Narendra Modi’s appointment as the campaign chief for the 2014 general elections.

While the Janata Dal-United’s decision to break away from its alliance with the BJP, and senior leader L.K. Advani’s patent dissatisfaction with Modi’s elevation can be counted as major shocks, the minor ones include the resignation of a BJP vice president, Amir Raza Hussain, in protest against the Gujarat strongman’s use of the word burqa, or veil, to describe the Congress’s tactics.

Modi’s comment that the Congress covered itself with the burqa of secularism whenever it was in trouble might have been regarded as an attempt at humour, but the BJP’s former member saw it as a dig against the practice of Muslim women covering themselves with an all-enveloping cloak. The observation can also be interpreted as a sly reiteration of the longstanding saffron equation of secularism with the Congress’s policy of minority “appeasement”.

The remark might not have touched a raw nerve if, in an interview with a foreign news agency, Modi had not compared the impact of the Gujarat riots on him with the pain caused by the running over of a puppy by a car. To make matters worse, the chief minister had boasted during the interview that he was a Hindu nationalist.

The observation led to the Congress’s Digvijay Singh asking why he didn’t call himself an Indian nationalist. Since then, posters proclaiming Modi’s patriotism and Hindu nationalism have appeared in Mumbai, provoking speculation about the BJP’s line.

What these episodes show is how closely each of Modi’s words and deeds is scrutinized because of his deeply-hued saffron background. To compound the situation, the assertion by his aide, Amit Shah, that the Ram temple will be built in Ayodhya, and Modi’s own visit to the Jagannath temple in Puri, have tended to confirm the impression that he is taking the party back to its hardline Hindutva agenda.

The suspicion is deepened by the fact that the Hindu supremacist Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) has seemingly thrown its full weight behind Modi and clearly wants him to be the BJP’s prime ministerial candidate. Modi

Yet, if the BJP is taking its time over naming him, it is probably because of two reasons. One is the internal opposition by Advani and Co. and the other is the fear that his projection will restrict the BJP’s appeal mainly to its core group of supporters to the exclusion of minorities and liberals.

It is in this context that Modi’s latest utterances have been seen as playing into the Congress’s hands. The eagerness with which Congressmen have sought to counter Modi – the veil of secularism is better than “naked communalism”, as Ajay Maken said – shows that they are happy to lure the BJP’s poster boy into the secular vs communal debate where he will be at a disadvantage.

It is to avoid this trap that the BJP’s Yashwant Sinha has advised Modi to stick to his development plank and not veer into the quicksand of ideology and identity politics. Although Modi started off with an emphasis on the Gujarat model of economic progress, the series of public functions and interactions with the media are apparently forcing him to digress into controversial areas.

Indirect pressure from his supporters in the social media may have also played a part in making him trash the Congress’s version of secularism. A reference to one of the less offensive comments circulating in the cyber world will demonstrate the attitude of his supporters.

“Today, the Congress parasites and the Gandhi family worshippers have made being a Hindu in India something shameful while barbarians who kill women and children by planting bombs and attacking train stations have become secular”, said a pro-Modi post on the internet. However, there is probably a feeling in the Modi camp that if he listens to the counsels of restraint, his appeal will seem diluted not only to his ardent supporters but even generally, since he has purposefully cultivated an aggressive image.

The Congress will be pleased, however, if he continues in the same vein. There is little doubt that the party will be uneasy with any focus on governance, considering how its own “deficits” in this respect were noted by union Finance Minister P. Chidambaram not long ago. On the secular-communal divide, however, it apparently feels that it is on a much stronger wicket although a section of the media feels that there is too much emphasis on the majority-minority factor.

But, for the Congress, it is the only subject on which it can hold forth with some assurance since the background of scams, policy paralysis and economic slowdown cannot but make it defensive. What is more, like the BJP, the Congress, too, is unwilling to name its prime ministerial candidate, though for a different reason. It is that while Manmohan Singh has lost much of his earlier appeal, Rahul Gandhi hasn’t quite lived up to the part.

by Amulya Ganguli (IANS) is a political analyst.

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

  1. says: sundararaman

    The political democratic election campaign followed by Mr.Narendra Modi and the field followed in not fruitful approach towards his potential thought and new election research followed election campaign through Medias like Face book, Twitter, and Youtube to reach the victory of BJP vote Bank policy is not satisfactory followed THE POLICY of Mr.Modi will not reach the Rural population of the country where two third of the agricultural population
    followed. the poor population at the villages only follow the election campaign should be followed in streets and villages following their grievances and bring them when the party come to power and also assurance with confidence.. this policy is not reached by the BJP POLITICAL CIRCLE FOLLOWED UNDER THE LEADERSHIP Of Mr.Modi. rather following THE URBAN POPULATION TO REACH THE VICTORY OF BJP PARTY ignoring 370 constituencies of the country.’ the Father of the NATION MAHATHMA GANDHI HAS SAID IF YOU FOLLOW THE GROWTH OF THE COUNTRY YOU SHOULD PROMOTE THE VILLAGES PROMOTING AGRICULTURE’ THE REALITY OF GANDHI POLICY IS FOLLOWED BY CONGRESS TILL NOW FROM NEHERU THE FIRST PRIME MISTER OF INDIA.THIS IS MY OPINION FOLLOWED COVERED FULLY WITH URBAN AND RURAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN SHOULD BE FOLLOWED TO REACH THE VOTE BANK VICTORY FOR RULING THE NATION WHO EVER IT IS.

  2. says: sundararaman

    MY OPINION.THE REALITY OF ELECTION CAMPAIGN NEVER FOLLOWS WITH NEW RESEARCH OF ‘SOCIAL MEDIAS WITH FACEBOOK,TWITTER AND YOUTUBE’.WILL NOT REACH TOTAL POPULATION OF THE COUNTRY. FOLLOW THE OLD AND THE EXISTING POLICY FOLLOWED SINCE SIX DECADES BY THE CONGRESS.

Leave a comment
Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.